Share:


Theatre and creative communication during COVID-19 pandemic: the case of National Kaunas Drama Theatre, Lithuania

    Ina Pukelytė   Affiliation

Abstract

The article deals with the questions of digital communication and theatre during the lockdown in 2020–2021. With the example of the National Kaunas Drama Theatre, Lithuania, it is revealed that COVID-19 pandemic forced the cultural sector to experiment and use digital products in new conceptual ways. National Kaunas Drama Theatre proposed their audience an online platform Theatre Onl1ne TV (originally in Lithuanian: Teatras Onl1ne TV), and developed performances which were adapted to the digital environment of the lockdown period: some of the performances were transmitted on Zoom Video Communications platform, especially those for children and adolescents, some of them, such as The Flickering, tested new ways of integrating audiences digitally into theatrical action. The latter performance was created for Facebook users, lasted for four evenings and invited them to become co-creators of the story. The analysis reveals that digital theatre communication attracted audiences of younger generations and can be a useful creative tool in developing a relationship with the new generation of theatre-goers.

Keyword : COVID-19 pandemic, creative communication, cross-communication, digital communication, digital platforms, digital theatre, National Kaunas Drama Theatre, performances online, public sphere, theatre

How to Cite
Pukelytė, I. (2023). Theatre and creative communication during COVID-19 pandemic: the case of National Kaunas Drama Theatre, Lithuania. Creativity Studies, 16(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.15611
Published in Issue
Jan 12, 2023
Abstract Views
574
PDF Downloads
571
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

15min.lt. (2020). 15 min naujienos – Kai rūpi, laikas 15 min. https://www.15min.lt/

Balme, Ch. B. (2014). The theatrical public sphere. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051668

Benson, R. (2009). Shaping the public sphere: Habermas and beyond. The American Sociologist, 40, 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-009-9071-4

Bolton, R. N., Parasuraman, A., Hoefnagels, A., Migchels, N., Kabadayi, S., Gruber, Th., Komarova Loureiro, Y., & Solnet, D. (2013). Understanding generation Y and their use of social media: A review and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 24(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231311326987

Bouwman, M. (2020). Marketing online and streams: What we can and must do to weather the storm. Arts Management Quarterly, 134, 56–62.

Brook, P. (2019). The empty space. A book about the theatre: Deadly, holy, rough, immediate. Scribner.

d’Alancaisez, P. (2021). Art in crisis and in solidarity. Arts Management Quarterly, 136, 15–19.

Dias Leite, A., Castro, G., & Piesco, J. (2020). “Tudo Que Coube Numa Vhs”: A Brazilian experience in earning money with online performing arts. Arts Management Quarterly, 134, 31–39.

Dixon, S. (2007). Digital performance: A history of new media in theater, dance, performance art, and installation. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2429.001.0001

Dixson-Declève, S., Balland, P.-A., Bria, F., Charveriat, C., Dunlop, K., Giovannini, E., Tataj, D., Hidalgo, C., Huang, A., Isaksson, D., Martins, F., Mir Roca, M., Morlet, A., Renda, A., & Schwaag Serger, S. (2021). Transformation post-COVID: Mobilising innovation for people, planet and prosperity. ESIR Policy Policy Brief No. 2. Publications Office of the European Union.

Dostoyevsky, F. (2001). Dover thrift editions. Crime and punishment. S. L. Rattiner (Ed.). P. Negri (General Ed.). Dover Publications, Inc.

Emden, Ch. J., & Midgley, D. (Eds.). (2015). Beyond habermas: Democracy, knowledge, and the public sphere. Berghahn Books.

Enjolras, B., & Steen-Johnsen, K. (2017). The digital transformation of the political public sphere: A sociological perspective. In F. Engelstad, H. Larsen, J. Rogstad, & K. Steen-Johnsen (Eds.), Institutional change in the public sphere: Views on the Nordic Model (pp. 99–117). De Gruyter Open Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110546330-006

Felton-Dansky, M. (2018). Viral performance: Contagious theaters from modernism to the digital age. Northwestern University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv47w3vf

Feroz, A. K., Zo, H., & Chiravuri, A. (2021). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A review and research agenda. Sustainability, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530

Fokin, K. (2016). Ogon. Veche.

Giannachi, G. (2004). Virtual theatres: An introduction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203500033

Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. The MIT Press.

It’s Kaunastic. (2021). Welcome to Kaunas. https://kaunastika.lt/map/wallographers-notes

Kas vyksta Kaune. (2021). Apie mus. https://kaunas.kasvyksta.lt/

Klivis, E. (2015). Completing (Public) spheres: Theatre and media in the Baltic States. Meno istorija ir kritika, 11, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.7220/2335-8769.11.5

Koleva, P., Sandell, T., Bardun, Y., Nola, di M., & Gaeta, J. (2021). Creative and cultural industries cross-innovations: Collaboration for sustainable growth in the Northern dimension countries. Arts Management Quarterly, 136, 5–14.

Kolsteeg, J. (2020). New ways of audience engagement. Arts Management Quarterly, 134, 15–20.

Lausund, I. (2013). Bandscheibenvorfall – Ein Abend für Leute mit Haltungsschäden. In Suhrkamp spectaculum. Hysterikon/Bandscheibenvorfall/Benefiz (pp. 75–142). Suhrkamp Verlag.

Masura, N. (2020). Palgrave studies in performance and technology. Digital theatre: The making and meaning of live mediated performance, US & UK 1990–2020. S. Broadhurst & J. Machon (Eds.). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55628-0

Nichols, T. Ph., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2019). Assembling “Digital Literacies”: Contingent pasts, possible futures. Media and Communication, 7(2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i2.1946

Ossewaarde, M. (2019). Digital transformation and the renewal of social theory: Unpacking the new fraudulent myths and misplaced metaphors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.007

Picon-Vallin, B. (1999). Arts du spectacle. Vol. 17. Meyerhold: Les voies de la création théâtrale. CNRS Editions.

Piscator, E. (1968). Schriften. Vol. 1: Das Politische Theater. Henschelverlag.

Rasmussen, T. (2013). Internet-based media, Europe and the political public sphere. Media, Culture and Society, 35(1), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712464563

Rasmussen, T. (2008). The internet and differentiation in the political public sphere. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/nor-2017-0178

Robinson, M. (2021). Why us? Community music at Konzerthaus Dortmund, Germany. Arts Management Quarterly, 136, 38–45.

Vilnelė, G. (2021). Spektaklis tarp draugų: interaktyvus socialinių tinklų spektaklis „Mirgėjimas“. 7 meno dienos, 12(1377). https://www.7md.lt/teatras/2021-03-26/Spektaklis-tarp-draugu

Whyte, Ch. (2018). Crossing the digital divide: Monism, dualism and the reason collective action is critical for cyber theory production. Politics and Governance, 6(2), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i2.1338

Williamson, B. (2017). Educating silicon valley: Corporate education reform and the reproduction of the techno-economic revolution. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 39(3), 265–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2017.1326274

YouTube. (2022). Teatras Onl1ne TV. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLsHdW68jHGRxE9aLA-_r6RPc6c3lwld2t